ENG 1020 Introductory College Writing
Section Number -- 035 Crn 14818 T Th 3:00-4:20 p.m.
Fall 2008 212 State Hall
Caroline Maun 9504.2 Maccabees
av4495@wayne.edu Office Hours:
phone: 313-577-3354 T Th 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m
General Education Designation
With a grade of C or better, ENG 1020 fulfills the General Education Basic Composition (BC) graduation requirement. Successful completion of Basic Composition (BC) with a grade of C or better is a prerequisite to enrolling in courses that fulfill the General Education IC (Intermediate Composition) requirement for graduation (e.g., ENG 3010, 3050, Literature and Writing courses).
Course Description
Building upon students’ diverse skills, English 1020 prepares students for reading, research, and writing in college classes. The main goals of the course are (1) to teach students to consider the rhetorical situation for any piece of writing; (2) to have students integrate reading, research, and writing in the genres of analysis and argument; and (3) to teach students to develop analyses and arguments using appropriate content, effective organization, and appropriate expression and mechanics, all while using a flexible writing process that incorporates drafting, revising, editing, and documenting sources.
To achieve these goals, the course places considerable emphasis upon the relationship between reading and writing, the evaluation and development of information and ideas through research, the genres of analysis and argumentation, and the use of multiple technologies for research and writing.
Section Description
This course will help you to organize and perfect your writing. You will build confidence in your skills and expand on new skills. You will also enhance your ability to read critically and to interpret texts. You will have an expanded understanding of the situations that communication takes place in, and a greater appreciation for the explicit and implicit components of meaning. There is a practical side and a theoretical side to what we are doing, and that means two things. Practical skills develop as a result, for the most part, of practice, with coaching. Theoretical knowledge comes from reading, discussing, and thinking about how and why things are. You will be drawing on both sides of your brain in this course as you balance your increasing development as a writer with your analysis of how and what makes writing effective. And, incidentally, we will have fun. I will do all that I can to bring to bear the relevance of us as individuals, at this particular moment in time, undertaking the study of written communication. This endeavor is important, and my responsibility is to show you why and to provide you with feedback so you can develop as much as possible in the three months ahead.
Learning Objectives
- to develop analytical and critical strategies for reading complex texts with varied sources of information, multiple perspectives, and complicated arguments
- to identify and analyze the structure of analysis and arguments in a variety of texts and media, identifying authors’ claims, evidence, appeals, organization, and style, and evaluating their persuasive effect
- to consider the rhetorical situation for any given piece of writing, including audience, purpose, and context
- to conduct research by finding and evaluating print and electronic sources, generating information and ideas from research, and synthesizing them with respect to the topic and ideas of the writer
- to write effectively in multiple analytical and argumentative genres, generating a clearly defined topic and purpose/thesis, organizing and developing complex content and reasoning, and using standard text conventions for academic writing
- to use a flexible writing process that includes generating ideas, writing, revising, providing/responding to feedback in multiple drafts, and editing text and tone for multiple audiences
- to make productive use of a varied set of technologies for research and writing
Required Textbook
Lunsford, Andrea A., and John J. Ruskiewicz. Everything’s an Argument. 4th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2007.
Required Readings: See the Schedule of Meetings, below.
Required Handbook
Ruszkiewicz, John, Daniel E. Seward, and Maxine Hairston. SF Writer. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008.
Required Materials (in addition to textbooks):
- Regular Internet access, either at home or through a lab or a library, and logging in to Blackboard at least twice weekly.
- You will need a two-pocket folder to keep your papers in and to construct your portfolio.
- You should have access to Adobe Acrobat Reader in order to read electronic texts. This program is available for free download at http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html.
You will need your WSU AccessID and password to log on (also used for Pipeline). Use your Wayne State University email throughout the course. For assistance with your AccessID, contact the C&IT Help Desk at (313) 577-4778.
Course Requirements (For all papers you will receive a detailed handout, also see the Schedule of Meetings, below, for due dates)
- Paper # 1 -- Analysis paper (research-based) 3 pages
- Analysis of the rhetorical situation of a text or speech.
- Paper # 2 -- Argument paper 1 (research-based) 3 pages
- Using one of our texts as a touchstone, construct an argument in response to it, either amplifying its points, refuting it, or constructing a sensitive and sensible combination of the two.
- Paper # 3 – Review paper (research-based) 5 pages
- Choosing one of the electronic readings we have done you will research and write a summary and review of the entire work from which it was taken.
- Paper # 4 -- Argument paper 2 (research-based) 10 pages
- What is argument? How is it applicable to the process of education, of civic duty? What forms does it take? How does it matter to your future?
- Class Participation (see description below)
- Presentation
- You will do a 15 minute presentation based on either your work for Paper #3 or Paper #4.
- Portfolio:As you accumulate drafts, papers, and peer reviews you will organize them in your 2-pocket folder. Any rewrites that you choose to do will also be maintained in this folder. Each time you turn in your paper, you will do so in the folder and the folder will contain all of your previous work and any revisions to previous work. At the end of the semester, a substantial portion of your grade will be determined by the final results of your portfolio including revisions, drafts, peer reviews, corrections, and the completion of the error chart. You will receive additional instruction on this on the third day of class.
Grading Policies
- Class participation will include being present for activities, turning in assignments on time, participating in presentations, and providing constructive criticism and relevant, insightful commentary. It also includes engaging the material fully, asking questions, and classroom decorum. Classroom decorum (or rule): if you are speaking in class, what you say must be heard by ALL EARS IN THE ROOM. Speak up when you are contributing to class discussion and realize that you are not just talking to your instructor. In many ways it is your classmates who are going to teach you the most, so make connections and respect each other. Respect includes allowing others to speak if you are someone who tends to dominate conversations. Striving for balance in classroom participation takes work, human kindness, and respect.
- expectations for papers: Papers should be typed in 12 pt. font, double spaced, numbered, with the first page formatted as you see it in The SF Writer on page 335. No title pages for MLA formatted papers. Papers should be formatted with a staple and turned in with your portfolio.
- late papers/ drafts/ revisions: A draft of the paper is due in advance of the final copy for peer review purposes and the draft date is a firm deadline. You will receive a grade for your peer review effort, so in order to be prepared for the activity you must have a copy of your paper as complete as you can make it on your own. It should approximate the length, argument, and content of a final paper, with the understanding that a draft of a paper is not going to be as polished as a final copy and that major revisions may take place between drafts and final copies. All papers will need to show their full paper trail and if they are turned in late, a letter grade will be subtracted. Two weeks after the deadline late papers will not be accepted. If a paper is drafted on time and the final draft turned in on time, a student may then revise the paper once after it is graded to be considered for a higher mark. Late papers can not be revised.
- making up work: Work that is done during class time and in groups can not be made up. Any quizzes given during class can not be made up.
- weight given to each graded component in the course requirements:
- Class Participation – 10%
- Papers (#1 = 10%; #2 = 15%; #3 = 20% #4 = 25%) – 70%
- Presentation 10%
- Portfolio -- 10%
Writing Center
The Writing Center (2nd floor, UGL) provides individual tutoring consultations free of charge for students at Wayne State University. Undergraduate students in General Education courses, including composition courses, receive priority for tutoring appointments. The Writing Center serves as a resource for writers, providing tutoring sessions on the range of activities in the writing process – considering the audience, analyzing the assignment or genre, brainstorming, researching, writing drafts, revising, editing, and preparing documentation. The Writing Center is not an editing or proofreading service; rather, students are guided as they engage collaboratively in the process of academic writing, from developing an idea to correctly citing sources. To make an appointment, consult the Writing Center website: http://www.clas.wayne.edu/writing/. To submit material for online tutoring, consult the Writing Center HOOT website (Hypertext One-on-One Tutoring): http://www.clas.wayne.edu/unit-inner.asp?WebPageID=1330.
Office of Educational Accessibility Services
If you feel that you may need an accommodation based on the impact of a disability, please feel free to contact me privately to discuss your specific needs. Additionally, the Office of Educational Accessibility Services (EAS) coordinates reasonable accommodations for students with documented disabilities. The Office is located in 1600 David Adamany Undergraduate Library, phone: 313-577-1851/577-335 (TTD).
Course Policies
Enrolled students in any English classes must attend one of the first two class sessions; otherwise, they may be required to drop the class.
Attendance is taken at the beginning of class. I use the following scale to reward or penalize for attendance and I make no distinctions between excused or unexcused absences:
0 absences = +4 Points added to your final average
1 absences = +2
2 absences = +1
3 absences = 0 Any more than three absences subtracts from your final average.
4 absences = -3 Points subtracted from your final average
5 absences = -6
6 absences = -10
7 absences = -14
-----------------------------------At this point students with this many absences should withdraw immediately from the course through Pipeline.
8 absences = -19
9 absences = -24
10 absences = -30
11 absences = -36
12 absences = -43
For instance, a student with a final average of 83% (B) in the course, who was absent 5 times (excused or unexcused) will have the grade 83- 6 = 77. C+
Another student, who has a final average of 83% in the course, who has perfect attendance will have the grade 83 + 4 = 87. B+
If you leave class early or come in late you accumulate a minimum of ½ of an absence for that day.
- Adding and dropping the course: The last day to add the course is September 15th. You can manage your enrollment in the course, including dropping or withdrawal, through your Pipeline account (http://pipeline.wayne.edu).
- Withdrawals: Students who request withdrawals beginning with the 5th week of the term will now receive one of these notations:
-WP Withdrawal with a passing grade earned to date
-WF Withdrawal with a failing grade earned to date
-WN Withdrawal never attended, or no graded work to date
The last day to withdraw is the last day of class; students are not eligible for refunds if they withdraw late in the semester.
- Incompletes: the mark of “I” stands for “Incomplete.” It is given when a student has not completed all of the course work necessary to fulfill the course requirements, and when there is, in the judgment of the instructor, a reasonable probability that the student can complete the course successfully without again attending regular class sessions. The responsibility for completing all course work rests entirely with the student. The mark of “I” is inappropriate if, in the instructor's judgment, it will be necessary for the student to attend subsequent sessions of the course regularly. Should regular attendance become necessary, the student must re-register for the class. Incompletes will revert to a failing grade after one calendar year for both Undergraduates and Graduate Students. That means that work must be completed within one calendar year - there will be no extensions. The mark of “I” will be changed to a grade only when the student completes the course work as arranged with the instructor or, if the instructor has left the University, with the Chairperson of the department or Program Director. The mark of “I” which is not converted to a letter grade within one calendar year from the time it was received will be changed to an “F.”
- Plagiarism policy: First, we will go over pages 514-27 of Everything’s an Argument for our third class meeting after the introductory session (see the schedule of meetings). You will have a good understanding of plagiarism and a chance to ask questions about it. I reprint here what is said about penalties for plagiarism and academic ethics from the Undergraduate Bulletin of Wayne State:
College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Policy on Plagiarism (2005 – 2007 Undergraduate Bulletin, page 238):
The principle of honesty is recognized as fundamental to a scholarly community. Students are expected to honor this principle and instructors are expected to take appropriate action when instances of academic dishonesty are discovered. An instructor, on discovering such an instance, may give a failing grade on the assignment or for the course. The instructor has the responsibility of notifying the student of the alleged violation and the action being taken. Both the student and the instructor are entitled to academic due process in all such cases. Acts of dishonesty may lead to suspension or exclusion.
Wayne State University Policy on Student Ethics and Academic Work(2005 – 2007 Undergraduate Bulletin, page 45):
Academic work submitted by a student for credit is assumed to be of his/her own creation, and if found not to be, will constitute cause for the student’s dismissal.
The English Department mandates that cases of academic dishonesty be reported to the Associate Chair of the Department. I will be happy to assist you individually with the proper use of sources when your papers are in their draft stages. Any papers that come in as final drafts and overstep the boundaries and conventions of academic honesty will receive a failing grade and notification to the Department of English will be made. A grade of F that results from plagiarism will not be revisable and will factor in to the total grade. If two such assignments are turned in by any student, then the course grade will be an F for the semester. Writing and submitting drafts of papers on time is required in this course and if there is a situation arising at that stage you will be allowed to revise the work to correct the issue.
- Computer use during class: You may bring laptops to class or use computers in the classroom only at times designated for that use.
- Cell Phones:Set cell phones to vibrate or off completely, and if you must take an emergency call, exit the classroom first.
- Email: When writing to classmates or an instructor on email, always be sure to sign your email with your first and last name. Your email address does not always indicate who you are—especially if it shows only your Wayne State Access ID. Use the Blackboard email system for class business only.
Schedule of Meetings
|
Date
|
Reading Assignment due
|
Coursework due
|
|
T Sept. 2
|
None
|
Go over syllabus, introductions
|
|
Th Sept. 4
|
From Omnivore’s Dilemma by Michael Pollan.
|
|
|
T Sept.9
|
Everything’s an Argument, pp. 514-27, discussion of plagiarism, statements of the department and the university; reading from Metaphors We Live By by George Lakoff
|
|
|
Th Sept.11
|
Everything’s an Argument, pp. 3-44.
|
|
|
T Sept. 16
|
Reading from The Zookeeper’s Wife by Diane Ackerman
|
Peer Review #1
|
|
Th Sept. 18
|
Everything’s an Argument, pp. 45-77.
|
Paper # 1 due
|
|
T Sept.23
|
Reading “The Dawn of Freedom,” from The Souls of Black Folk by W. E. B. Du Bois; Everything’s an Argument, pp. 78-101.
|
|
|
Th Sept.25
|
Everything’s an Argument pp. 102-136.
|
|
|
T Sept. 30
|
Reading “Are You a Connector,” from The Tipping Point, by Malcolm Gladwell;
|
|
|
Th Oct. 2
|
Everything’s an Argument pp.139-173.
|
|
|
T Oct. 7
|
Everything’s an Argument pp.174-194.
|
Peer Review #2
|
|
Th Oct.9
|
Everything’s an Argument pp.195-216.
|
Paper #2 due
|
|
T Oct.14
|
Reading from Musicophilia, by Oliver Sacks; Everything’s an Argument pp.217-249.
|
|
|
Th Oct.16
|
Everything’s an Argument pp.250-284.
|
|
|
T Oct.21
|
Reading from In Defense of Food, by Michael Pollan; Everything’s an Argument pp.285-326
|
|
|
Th Oct.23
|
Everything’s an Argument pp.327-366.
|
|
|
T Oct. 28
|
“Politics and the English Language,” by George Orwell; Everything’s an Argument pp.369-410.
|
|
|
Th Oct.30
|
Everything’s an Argument pp. 411-440.
|
|
|
T Nov. 4
|
Everything’s an Argument pp.441-466.
|
Peer Review #3
|
|
Th Nov. 6
|
Everything’s an Argument pp.469-490.
|
Paper #3 due
|
|
T Nov.11
|
Reading from Don’t Think of an Elephant, by George Lakoff; Everything’s an Argument pp.491-511.
|
|
|
Th Nov.13
|
Student presentations
|
|
|
T Nov.18
|
“Troublemakers,” by Malcolm Gladwell
|
|
|
Th Nov. 20
|
Student presentations
|
|
|
T Nov. 25
|
No Class-- Scheduled as a Thursday
|
Scheduled as a Thursday
|
|
Th Nov. 27
|
Student Presentations
|
Peer Review #4
|
|
T Dec.2
|
Student Presentations
|
Paper #4 due
|
|
Th Dec.4
|
Student Presentations
|
|
|
T Dec.9
|
Return of 4th paper; go over Portfolios; student presentations
|
|
|
Th Dec.11
|
No Class
|
|
|
T Dec.16
|
No Class
|
|
|
Th Dec. 18
|
|
Portfolios are due no later than this date
|
Course Bibliography (Bibliographical references for our electronic readings)
Ackerman, Diane. The Zookeeper's Wife: A War Story. W. W. Norton, 2008.
DuBois, W. E. B. The Souls of Black Folk. W. W. Norton, 1999.
Kakutani, Michiko. “Is Jon Stewart the Most Trusted Man in America?.” The New York Times 17 Aug 2008. 19 Aug 2008 <http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/17/arts/television/17kaku.html>.
Lakoff, George. Don't Think of an Elephant: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate--The Essential Guide for Progressives. Chelsea Green, 2004.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. University Of Chicago Press, 1980.
Pollan, Michael. In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto. Penguin Press HC, The, 2008.
---. The Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals. Penguin, 2007.
Sacks, Oliver. Musicophilia: Tales of Music and the Brain. Vintage, 2008.
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.